- Welcome
- About Us
- Attorneys
- Mediations
- Practice Areas
- Acquisitions and Mergers
- Mediation Services
- Banking and Creditor Relations
- Commercial Litigation
- Corporate and Finance
- Education
- Labor, Employment, and Governmental Law
- Estate Planning and Elder Law
- Healthcare Law
- Insurance Defense
- Local Government Law
- Medical Malpractice Defense
- Professional Liability
- Real Estate Transactions
- Taxation
- Tort Litigation
- Recruitment
- Publications
- News
- Contact Us
- Disclaimer
Business Transaction Newsletter – March 2021
March 23rd, 2021 •
Comments Off on Business Transaction Newsletter – March 2021
WHAT IS ENOUGH CONSIDERATION TO SUPPORT A CONTRACT? In the case of Lance vs. Alcoa Hotel Hospitality, LLC, the Tennessee Court of Appeals dealt with the issue of what constitutes sufficient consideration to support a contract. In the Lance case, Lance entered into a contract with Alcoa Hotel Hospitality, LLC (“Alcoa”), to sell his 5.47%… Read More
RKRB announces new partners.
January 3rd, 2020 •
Comments Off on RKRB announces new partners.
The partners of RKRB are pleased to announce that Christie Burbank (Chattanooga), Matthew Courtner (Jackson), Chris Frulla (Memphis), and Mark Kinsman (Chattanooga) became partners of RKRB effective January 1, 2020.
Employment Law Alert – Winter 2019
January 11th, 2019 •
Comments Off on Employment Law Alert – Winter 2019
E-Verify: Who It Applies To, and What Happens During the Government Shutdown This article discusses which employers must use E-Verify, and then, what employers should do to verify employment status during the current government shutdown. As of January 1, 2017, private employers with 50 or more employees under the same Federal Employer Identification Number (FEIN)… Read More
Business Transaction Newsletter – September 2018
September 28th, 2018 •
Comments Off on Business Transaction Newsletter – September 2018
IN TENNESSEE “AS-IS” WHERE-IS” MEANS WHAT IT SAYS In the case of Briggs & Stratton Power Products Group, LLC vs. Osram Sylvania, Inc., Et Al, the Court dealt with the interpretation of a commercial lease which described the condition of the leased premises as being in an “AS-IS, WHERE-IS” condition, with all faults… Read More
